Posts Tagged ‘mortgages’

New Good Faith Estimate debuts January 1, encourages comparison shopping

December 30th, 2009

A new Good Faith Estimate enters into effect January 1, with the goal of simplifying loan origination and settlement costs and making it easier for consumers to comparison shop between lenders.

What’s a Good Faith Estimate?

A good faith estimate must be provided by a mortgage lender or broker to a customer, as required by the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA). The estimate must include an itemized list of fees and costs associated with your loan and must be provided within three business days of applying for a loan.

While this is a form that is provided prior to closing, it is useful to use this document to compare the actual fees to be paid at closing as detailed in the HUD-1 Settlement Statement.

What’s changing?

The new form is now three pages instead of one, and more clearly lays out the various costs associated with your mortgage loan as well as which ones can and cannot change before closing:

Charges that cannot increase at settlement

  • Origination charges
  • Your credit or charge (points) for the specific interest rate chosen (after you lock in your interest rate)
  • Your adjusted origination charges (after you lock in your interest rate)
  • Transfer taxes

Charges for which the total can increase no more than 10% at settlement

  • Requires services that we select
  • Title services and lender’s title insurance (if we select them or you use companies we identify)
  • Owner’s title insurance (if you use companies we identify)
  • Required services that you can shop for (if you use companies we identify)
  • Government recording charges

Charges that can change at settlement

  • Required services that you can shop for (if you do not use companies we identify)
  • Title services and lender’s title insurance (if you do not use companies we identify)
  • Owner’s title insurance (if you do not use companies we identify)
  • Initial deposit for your escrow account
  • Daily interest charges
  • Homeowner’s insurance

What to do if you still have questions

You can get more information from the HUD site, or ask a question in SmartHippo Answers and get free replies to your question delivered right to your inbox!

(Image courtesy wooleyduck on flickr.)

The week in review: back to economic reality, mortgage rates drop, a visual guide to financial crisis & more…

November 17th, 2008

It’s a busy time of year, so you may not have been able to catch all the interesting headlines last week. Here’s a collection of some of my favorite reading from last week:mortgage photo

I’m always looking for great sources of financial/mortgage-related news. If I’m missing one, drop a comment!

California’s Next Mortgage Crisis

April 16th, 2008

With California being particularly hard hit by falling home prices (a 26% drop in February compared to the previous year), Slate suggests the next wave will be prime borrowers simply walking away from mortgages that no longer make financial sense.

Lenders had no reservations about selling borrowers loans with rising payments that would be poisonous in a rising market. Now it seems borrowers have no reservations about leaving those lenders with the risks they begged to take.

You can read the full article here.

Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac: Appraisal Rules About to Get Stricter

March 4th, 2008

Fannie MaeFannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the two largest buyers of mortgages on the secondary market, will be toughening up their home appraisal standards as of January 1, 2009.

Freddie MacWhat did appraisal standards have to do with the mortgage crisis? Up until now, the relationship between a loan officer or broker and a home appraiser has been pretty snug. In many cases, loan officers would pick individuals who would create inflated appraisal reports, making it easier for a consumer to qualify for a bigger loan.

Under the new rules, employees involved in issuing mortgage loans can no longer be involved in the appraisal process, and an independent organization will be set up to monitor appraisal practices.

New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo, who had been investigating inflated mortgage appraisals, will now close the file.

The Bush Subprime Bailout: What about the Problems that Got Us into this Mess to Begin With?

December 7th, 2007

The web is abuzz this week with reaction to President Bush’s plan to help homeowners with subprime mortgages who are at risk of foreclosure. Bush announced the plan yesterday, which is aimed at 1.2 million borrowers who are at risk of foreclosure when their “teaser” rate period ends and the rates are readjusted. These borrowers will be able to either refinance their mortgage, have it guaranteed by the Fair Housing Administration, or freeze their teaser rate for a five year period.

MoneyCrashers correctly pointed out that there is enough blame to go around:

My original position stays the same that I believe mortgage brokers, mortgage lenders, and consumers are equally responsible for the collapse in the subprime market. Consumers knew what they were getting into when they signed the dotted line. No one is stupid enough to think that they can buy a $400,000 house with little money down for such a low payment. They had to understand the risk of the rising interest rates in the future. Mortgage lenders knew exactly what they were doing, too. Their philosophy was: just grab all of the business we can during the housing boom and figure out what we did later. I don’t think they were forecasting the amount of foreclosures that we’re seeing and going to see in the future.

SmartHippo has issued a press release stating that while the bailout is good news for consumers who may otherwise lose their homes, the root causes remain unaddressed.

“Let’s face it. Some consumers took on loans they knew they couldn’t afford, but others lacked the knowledge or information to make wise decisions. This was exploited by certain lenders who put short-term financial gain ahead of their customers’ best interests,” said Favvas.

Favvas cited the example of mortgage brokers who steered consumers to subprime loans from lenders paying the brokers higher commissions, even when the consumers could have qualified for lower-interest prime loans.

“The subprime crisis has triggered the beginning of a fundamental transformation which will lead to a more consumer-centric approach to lending based on transparency and accountability,” Favvas said. “The lenders who understand and embrace this transformation are the ones who will succeed in the long run.”

You can read the full press release over at Yahoo! Finance.

Until we empower consumers with the tools to make better financial decisions, and create economic incentives for lenders, we’re just setting ourselves up for a repeat — whether it’s in three, five, seven, 10 or 15 years.

There’s an old adage that says that if you owe the bank $100 and you can’t pay, it’s your problem, but if you owe the bank $100 million and you can’t pay, it’s their problem. You can now add to that if 1.2 million people owe the banks $350 billion and can’t pay, well, then it becomes the government’s problem.

What do you think?